🔗 Share this article

You've likely seen Psycho, The Silence of the Lambs, and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Maybe you've even read the original novels that served as the basis for the first two films. Now prepare to encounter the individual who inspired the Bates Motel owner, the serial killer, and the chainsaw-wielding villain. The infamous Ed Gein!

The first two seasons of the series in question focused on the Milwaukee monster – a name with strong recognition. This was followed by the sibling duo – a somewhat specialized story for dedicated true crime fans. Attention now shifts to the Butcher of Plainfield. Although he doesn't possess the household name status of other notorious killers, and his confirmed victims number just two, his grave desecrations and gruesome creativity with the deceased have left a lasting mark. Even now, any media featuring mutilated bodies, removed epidermis, or skin-based artifacts probably owes a debt to his actions from over 70 years ago.

A Tone of Flippancy

Is my tone too casual? It's clearly the deliberate approach of the production team. It's uncommon to witness a drama that dwells so eagerly on the most heinous acts an individual – and humanity – can commit. This extends to a substantial narrative strand devoted to the horrors of the Third Reich, shown with minimal moral context.

Structural and Stylistic Strengths

In terms of construction and style, the show is impressive. The pacing is flawless, and the clever interweaving of past and present is executed brilliantly. Viewers witness Charlie Hunnam as the killer in action – the homicides, grave robberies, and curating his gruesome trophies. Simultaneously, the present-day narrative follows the creative minds as they craft the iconic film from Bloch's Gein-inspired novel. The blending of the real – his devout parent and his fixation with women resembling her – and fictionalized scenes – fetishistic depictions of the Buchenwald criminal and SS officer gatherings – is handled with technical skill.

A Critical Shortcoming

What it lacks, and unforgivably so, is ethical commentary or deeper insight to offset the lingering, loving shots of Gein's depraved acts. The series portrays his vibrant fantasy life and positions him as a helpless individual of his domineering mother and an accomplice with dark interests. The underlying suggestion seems to be: How could a mentally ill man resist? During a key moment, the novelist speculates that without seeing certain images, Gein would have remained a small-town simpleton.

Breaking from Past Success

One might contend that a show from this stable – known for glossy, high-camp style – is an unlikely source for deep psychological exploration. But previous works like The People v OJ Simpson offered sharp analysis on the press and the legal system. The Versace murder story explored fame and culture. The Clinton scandal series examined systemic sexism. Thus, it is possible, and the producer has succeeded before.

The Final Verdict

But not here. This installment feels like an exploitation of a lesser-known criminal case. It asks for empathy for the man behind the masks without offering genuine insight into how he became a monster. Beyond the simplistic "devout parent" reasoning, there is no attempt to comprehend the origins or prevent future cases. This is merely gratuitous spectacle to the basest instincts of the audience. The wartime sequences do have lovely lighting, admittedly.