🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard women from abuse, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop laws and support services to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups described as a major regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could possibly return the legislation for further consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable discussions in other EU countries